USPTO serial 76234506
EVZINC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVZINC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hawthorne, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerow D. Brill
GEROW D BRILL REVEO, INC85 EXECUTIVE BLVDELMSFORD, NY 10523UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fuel cell components, namely anodes, cathodes, and membranes; fuel cell batteries; fuel cell subsystems comprised of anodes, cathodes and membranes; fuel cell battery systems comprised of anodes, cathodes, and membranes; fuel cell battery systems comprised of anodes, cathodes, and membranes; and fuel cell battery hybrid systems comprised of anodes, cathodes, and membranes; and products utilizing fuel cell components, fuel cell batteries, fuel cell subsystems, fuel cell battery systems, fuel cell battery hybrid systems, namely metal air batteries and fuel cells, all using metal air technology with zinc as fuel | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacture of Fuel Cell Components, Fuel cell Batteries, Fuel Cell Subsystems, Fuel Cell Battery Systems, Fuel Cell Battery Hybrid Systems and products utilizing Fuel Cell Components, Fuel Cell Batteries, Fuel Cell Subsystems, Fuel Cell Battery Systems, Fuel Cell Battery Hybrid Systems, all using metal air technology with zinc as fuel, to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development for others of Fuel Cell Components, Fuel Cell Batteries, Fuel Cell Subsystems, Fuel cell Battery Systems, Fuel Cell Hybrid Systems and products utilizing Fuel Cell Components, Fuel Cell Batteries, Fuel Cell Subsystems, Fuel Cell Battery Systems, Fuel cell Battery Hybrid Systems, all using metal-air technology with zinc as fuel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |