USPTO serial 76234513
VERY SEXY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 3, 2005
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VERY SEXY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
REYNOLDSBURG, OH
Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | personal care products, namely, [and ]massage oil | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by V Secret Catalogue, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by V Secret Catalogue, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by V Secret Catalogue, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named VERY SEXY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 4, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |