Drawing for REFREC

USPTO serial 76234514

REFREC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REFREC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerow D. Brill

GEROW D BRILL REVEO, INC85 EXECUTIVE BLVDELMSFORD, NY 10523UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009FUEL CELL COMPONENTS, NAMELY ANODES, CATHODES, AND MEMBRANES; FUEL CELL BATTERIES; FUEL CELL SUBSYSTEMS COMPRISED OF ANODES, CATHODES AND MEMBRANES; FUEL CELL BATTERY SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF ANODES, CATHODES, AND MEMBRANES; FUEL CELL BATTERY SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF ANODES, CATHODES, AND MEMBRANES; FUEL CELL BATTERY HYBRID SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF ANODES, CATHODES AND MEMBRANES; AND PRODUCTS UTILIZING FUEL CELL COMPONENTS, FUEL CELL BATTERIES, FUEL CELL SUBSYSTEMS, FUEL CELL BATTERY SYSTEMS, FUEL CELL BATTERY HYBRID SYSTEMS, NAMELY METAL AIR BATTERIES AND FUEL CELLS, ALL USING METAL AIR TECHNOLOGYACTIVE—
040MANUFACTURE OF FUEL CELL COMPONENTS, FUEL CELL BATTERIES, FUEL CELL SUBSYSTEMS, FUEL CELL BATTERY SYSTEMS, FUEL CELL BATTERY HYBRID SYSTEMS AND PRODUCTS UTILIZING FUEL CELL COMPONENTS, FUEL CELL BATTERIES, FUEL CELL SUBSYSTEMS, FUEL CELL BATTERY SYSTEMS, FUEL CELL BATTERY HYBRID SYSTEMS, ALL USING METAL-AIR TECHNOLOGY, TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERSACTIVE—
042DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS OF FUEL CELL COMPONENTS, FUEL CELL BATTERIES, FUEL CELL SUBSYSTEMS, FUEL CELL BATTERY SYSTEMS, FUEL CELL HYBRID SYSTEMS AND PRODUCTS UTILIZING FUEL CELL COMPONENTS; FUEL CELL BATTERIES, FUEL CELL SUBSYSTEMS, FUEL CELL BATTERY SYSTEMS, FUEL CELL BATTERY HYBRID SYSTEMS, ALL USING METAL-AIR TECHNOLOGYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance