USPTO serial 76234592
AIR IDEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2712679Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 6, 2003
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AIR IDEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
69280 MARCY L'ETOILE, FR
69280 MARCY L'ETOILE, FR
69280 MARCY L'ETOILE, FR
69280 MARCY L'ETOILE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maury M Tepper, III
MAURY M TEPPER, III TEPPER & EYSTER, PLLC3724 BENSON DRIVERALEIGH, NC 27609UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | AEROBIOCOLLECTOR WHICH IS A DEVICE FOR THE SAMPLING OF ATMOSPHERIC AIR AND THE DETECTION OF BIOCONTAMINATION AND IS COMPRISED OF A PUMP IN ORDER TO COLLECT AIR SAMPLES AND MOVING SCREENS IN ORDER TO PICK UP ALL THE VIABLE PARTICLES OF A PREDETERMINED SIZE AND SOFTWARE TO RECORD THE PARAMETERS OF THE SAMPLING OPERATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 6, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2014 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 8, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 8, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 7, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |