USPTO serial 76234676
LIFESTYLIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIFESTYLIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Quinto
DAVID W QUINTO QUINN EMANUEL URQUHARTOLIVER & HEDGES LLP 865 S FIGUEROA ST FL10LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2543Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, COOKBOOKS, MAGAZINES AND NEWSLETTERS DEALING WITH THE CULINARY ARTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF THE CULINARY ARTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF ON-GOING TELEVISION PROGRAMS DEALING WITH THE CULINARY ARTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |