USPTO serial 76234776
RB ROYAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 27, 2003
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with RB ROYAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Brown
Jeffrey H. Brown MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP444 W. Lake Street, Suite 3200Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Manually operated metal valves; metal hose fittings; metal pipe fittings; metal fittings for use with internal combustion engines; metal fittings for use with compressed air pumps; metal fittings for hydraulic and pneumatic systems; fabricated metal tubing; metal fittings not made of precious metal adapted to be used with flexible hoses and metal tubing; metal cable wire; metal fittings to be used with metal cable wire; metal cable wire assemblies comprised of metal cable wire and metal fittings | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1987 |
| 040 | Custom manufacture for others of valves, engine test units, fittings not made of precious metal, fabricated tubing, flexible hose, fittings not made of precious metal adapted to be used with flexible hose, hose assemblies comprised of flexible hose and fittings, tubing, fittings not made of precious metal adapted to be used with tubing, tubing assemblies comprised of tubing and fittings, tubing and hose assemblies comprised of tubing, hoses and fittings not made of precious metal, cable, fittings not made of precious metal adapted to be used with cable, cable assemblies comprised of cable and fittings, and precision machined products | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RB Royal Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RB Royal Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RB Royal Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named RB ROYAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |