USPTO serial 76235000
WIRELESS WITNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WIRELESS WITNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Silent Witness Enterprises Ltd.
Surrey, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica Stone Levy
JESSICA STONE LEVY PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP701 FIFTH AVESTE 5000SEATTLE, WA 98104-7078Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SECURITY, MONITORING AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS FOR INSIDE AND OUTSIDE PREMISES COMPRISED OF VIDEO CAMERAS, DECOY VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO CAMERA HOUSING ASSEMBLIES, DECOY VIDEO CAMERA HOUSING ASSEMBLIES, VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS, VIDEO MONITORS, MOTION DETECTORS, MICROPHONES, AND CAMERA SWITCHING UNITS AND PARTS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, NAMELY, WIRING HARNESSES, MOUNTING HARDWARE AND CAMERA CARRYING BAGS; COMPONENTS FOR SECURITY, MONITORING AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, DECOY VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO CAMERA HOUSING ASSEMBLIES, DECOY VIDEO CAMERA HOUSING ASSEMBLIES, VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS, VIDEO MONITORS, MOTION DETECTORS, MICROPHONES, AND CAMERA SWITCHING UNITS, AND PARTS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFORE, NAMELY, WIRING HARNESSES, MOUNTING HARDWARE AND CAMERA CARRYING BAGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |