USPTO serial 76235006
X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
Frankfurt am Main 60325, DE
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
Frankfurt am Main 60325, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivian Polak
VIVIAN POLAK LEBOEUF, LAMB, GREENE & MACRAE, LLP125 W 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | BANKING SERVICES, NAMELY, CHECKING ACCOUNT SERVICES, TIME DEPOSITS AND BILL PAYMENT SERVICES; MUTUAL FUNDS BROKERAGE SERVICES, NAMELY, ESTABLISHING MUTUAL FUNDS FOR OTHER AND THE MANAGEMENT OF EQUITY, FIXED INCOME AND OTHER FUNDS; INVESTMENT ADVICE; PROVIDING INFORMATION, NAMELY, FINANCIAL RESEARCH, FINANCIAL NEWS, AND FINANCIAL CONSULTATION SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; SECURITIES BROKERAGE SERVICES; FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING BANKING SERVICES VIA THE INTERNET; PROVIDING INFORMATION TO ASSIST IN SECURITIES TRADING VIA THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |