USPTO serial 76235014
EPICENTRIC CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPICENTRIC CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach
CONNIE L ELLERBACH FENWICK & W LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQSTE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software that may be downloaded from a website site on a global computer network for use in the field of designing, implementing, customizing, hosting, managing and optimizing web pages and websites, and manuals supplied therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | advertising the goods and services of others via a website on a global computer network; computerized online retail services in the field of computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals and accessories, and website design, implementation, customization, hosting, management and optimization | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | communications services, namely, providing interactive chat rooms and bulletin boards on a global computer network for computer users to post and exchange information, opinions, and descriptions of product and service offerings | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer consultation services in the field of computer hardware, computer software and website design, implementation, customization, hosting, management and optimization; hosting software for others on local and global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Epicentric, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Epicentric, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EPICENTRIC CONNECT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |