Drawing for U2H

USPTO serial 76235119

U2H

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with U2H?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN A. GOLDSMITH

STEPHEN A GOLDSMITH LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in managing and documenting fund raising contributions and managing charity projects; interactive virtual reality video game software; interactive virtual reality video games comprised of computer hardware and software; computer and video game software, cartridges and discs; video game machines for use with televisionsACTIVE—
028Games, namely, adult and children's party games, arcade games, handheld unit for playing video games; teaching games, namely, board games, card games, role playing games, parlor games, manipulative games and action skill gamesACTIVE—
035Commercial information and directory agency services provided via the internet; business information provided via the internet, namely, marketing, demographic and customer behavior data; dissemination of advertising for others via the internet; computerized database management related to databases featuring goods for sale over the internetACTIVE—
036Charitable fund raisingACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games and lotteries and competitions via a global computer networkACTIVE—
042Design, development, maintenance, installation and integration of computer software for others; database development services for others featuring the development of databases containing games, lotteries and competitionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 10, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 1, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Oct 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance