Drawing for PAT & OSCAR'S

USPTO serial 76235185

PAT & OSCAR'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRONT, MITCHELL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAT & OSCAR'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROD S. BERMAN

ROD S BERMAN JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF RESTAURANTS FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 27, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 21, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 8, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 8, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 10, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 28, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 25, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 8, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance