USPTO serial 76235354
CONTENTFILM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTENTFILM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Rodner
STEPHEN B RODNER PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-4407UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | services, namely providing, video, motion pictures and audio content via the Internet by all means, including streaming and downloading | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |