Drawing for CERTIAUDIT

USPTO serial 76235385

CERTIAUDIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WINTER, ELIZABETH
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CERTIAUDIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID F. ZINGER

TERESA A LEE ESQ PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN LLP10TH FL410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE BY MERCHANTS AND TAXING AUTHORITIES USED FOR AUDITING MERCHANTS, REVIEWING SALES TAXES PAID BY MERCHANTS ON SALES TRANSACTIONS, REVIEWING CURRENT TAX LAWS AND REVIEWING TAX LAWS IN EFFECT AT TIME OF TRANSACTIONSACTIVE—
035SALES TAX PAYMENT VERIFICATION SERVICES VIA THE INTERNET FOR USE BY MERCHANTS AND TAXING AUTHORITIES TO AUDIT MERCHANTS AND TO REVIEW SALES TAXES PAID BY MERCHANTS ON SALES TRANSACTIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 25, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 25, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 22, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Feb 13, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance