USPTO serial 76235473
TOLERANCE, THE MILLENIUM STAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOLERANCE, THE MILLENIUM STAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry L. Kelmachter
BARRY L KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE PC900 CHAPEL ST STE 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2809UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing equipment, namely computers, computer peripherals; modems; multimedia software recorded on CD-ROMs in the field of communications; database servers, namely computers; electronic diaries, jukeboxes; automatic vending machines; blank video tapes; pocket calculators; video cameras; microprocessors; memory cards; magnetic coded cards; video game cassettes; recorded cinematographic films, compact disks, and optical disks; video screens; electric signs; photographic cameras; telephone apparatus, namely telephones; computer game cartridges; computer game cassettes; computer game disks; computer game programs; computer game software; computer game tapes, all relating to space and space travel | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | arcade-type electronic education video games; electronic educational game machines for children; toy, namely, battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects, all relating to space and space travel; board games; spacecraft toys monitored by software; dolls, plush toys; plush toys that are animated and talk via an electronic system; skis; kites; roller skates; scaled down models, namely model aircraft and model spacecraft; surfboards; parlor games; balls, namely baseballs, footballs, soccer balls, basketballs, volleyballs, handballs, tennis balls, and golf balls; balloons; chess boards; dominoes; hand held unit for playing electronic games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |