USPTO serial 76235524
TRUST. INTEGRITY. QUALITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2868272Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 3, 2004
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRUST. INTEGRITY. QUALITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHARLOTTE, NC
CHARLOTTE, NC
CHARLOTTE, NC
CHARLOTTE, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher D. Olszyk, Jr.
Christopher D. Olszyk, Jr. Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox DriveLawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | preventive maintenance of commercial, industrial, and manufacturing buildings and facilities; field supervision of construction projects, construction of pollution prevention and remediation systems, land reclamation, environmental remediation services, namely, excavation and disposal of hazardous and other wastes from soil and site cleanup, namely, disposal of unexploded ordnance and hazardous materials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1996 |
| 040 | Environmental remediation services, namely, soil treatment services, and Site cleanup, namely the treatment of explosives contaminated soil | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1996 |
| 042 | Traditional engineering and engineering consulting services, namely civil, electrical, mechanical, marine, facilities, and infrastructure engineering; assessment, evaluation, design, forensic engineering, failure analysis, all in relation to air, soils, water, machinery, processes, systems, facilities and structures; environmental engineering services, namely the conduct of studies and investigations, creation of solutions and design of facilities; design and engineering of pollution prevention and remediation systems; reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with environmental regulations and laws; military engineering services, namely, assessment and identification of unexploded ordnance and chemical warfare material | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZAPATA INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by ZAPATA ENGINEERING, P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by ZAPATA ENGINEERING, P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by ZAPATA ENGINEERING, P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TRUST. INTEGRITY. QUALITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |