Drawing for NUMEX

USPTO serial 76235551

NUMEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2770709Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 7, 2003
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUMEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE FL 10NEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management, namely management of commercial trade and advertising agencies; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network; office jobs, namely, secretarial and clerical services, word processing services, data processing servicesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
036Financial analysis, research and consultation, namely managing and providing an index relative to the performance of prices of shares with medium term capitalization with the object of providing information and as a reference parameter for financial instruments; insurance services, namely life insurance underwriting, insurance consultation, monetary exchange; financial services, namely financial forecasting, financial exchange, financial planning and management; risk management; financial portfolio management and stock brokerageSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2009C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Oct 23, 2009APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 31, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 6, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2005C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jun 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 2, 20021.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Aug 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance