USPTO serial 76235598
THE DIFFERENCE IS PERSONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE DIFFERENCE IS PERSONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Nishi
JOHN C NISHI WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE ML RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; computer hardware, namely, integrated circuits and circuit boards, computer peripherals, personal digital assistants; communications hardware and telecommunications hardware, namely, telephones, cellular telephones, radio telephones, mobile telephones, voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) telephones, telephone answering machines, intercoms, headsets and earphones for use with telephones, pagers, telecommunications and communications switches and switch systems; consumer electronic devices, namely, audio tape players, audio tape recorders, digital audio players, MP3 players, audio receivers, stereo receivers, compact disc players, video players, video tape players, digital video players, DVD players, digital video recorders, video receivers, video cameras, loudspeakers, headphones, earphones, television sets, video monitors, video recorders, radios, radios incorporating clocks, two-way radios, transceivers, megaphones; electronic devices for processing, modification, transmission, reception and modulation of sounds and audio content, namely, loudspeakers, sound enhancers, headphones, earphones, microphones; computer software for processing, modification, transmission, reception and modulation of sounds and audio content; computer software for the administration and interpretation of hearing tests, and for storing hearing test results | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | hearing aids; medical devices for processing, modification, transmission, reception and modulation of sounds and audio content, namely, sound enhancers, stethoscopes, assistive listening devices, headphones and earphones, microphones, loudspeakers; medical devices for testing hearing, namely, audiometers, headsets and earphones, loudspeakers, automated audiometers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | medical services, namely, administration of hearing tests; administration of hearing tests by means of electronic communications networks, telephones, and wireless communications media; testing for the development of psycho-acoustic and hearing profiles; testing for the development of psycho-acoustic and hearing profiles by means of electronic communications networks, telephone, and wireless communications media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sound ID
- Other trademarks owned by Sound ID
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE DIFFERENCE IS PERSONAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |