USPTO serial 76235854
IT'S NOT WHERE WE ARE - IT'S WHERE WE'RE GOING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IT'S NOT WHERE WE ARE - IT'S WHERE WE'RE GOING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kanata, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bert A. Collison
ELIZABETH ATKINS DUANE MORRIS LLP380 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Development and design services for others relating to telecommunications systems and semiconductor components, optoelectronic components and computer fields also in the form of sub-contract and custom manufacturing of silicon wafers for others; research relating to the telecommunications, semiconductor components, optoelectronic components and computer fields; maintenance and updating of computer programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |