Drawing for 17 SCENE

USPTO serial 76235890

17 SCENE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 17 SCENE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Baila H. Celedonia

BAILA H CELEDONIA COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRE-RECORDED VIDEOTAPES AND CD-ROMS FEATURING TOPICS OF INTEREST TO YOUNG ADULTS IN THE FIELDS OF FASHION, BEAUTY, ENTERTAINMENT, EDUCATION, INTERNET, SPORTS, MUSIC, VOLUNTEERISM, DECORATING, SHOPPING, CAREERS, HEALTH, FITNESS, DATING AND HOROSCOPESACTIVE—
035RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING CLOTHING; SHOES; HATS; BELTS; LEATHER GOODS; POCKETBOOKS; JEWELRY; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; MAKEUP; MAGAZINES; FRAGRANCES; COSMETICS; HAIR ACCESSORIES; PERSONAL ELECTRONIC GOODS, NAMELY, CD-PLAYERS, PORTABLE AUDIO SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF RADIO TUNERS, CD PLAYERS, MINI-DISC RECORDERS, MINI-DISC PLAYERS, MUSIC CASSETTE RECORDERS, MUSIC CASSETTE PLAYERS; AUDIO CASSETTE RECORDERS; AUDIO TAPE PLAYERS; AUDIO TAPE RECORDERS; CALCULATORS; VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS; DVD PLAYERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 28, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 11, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance