USPTO serial 76236084
VERIMETRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEJESUS, YSA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERIMETRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAE PARK-SUK
HAE PARK-SUK BARNES & THORNBURG750 17TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Biomedical and tools with sensing and actuating mechanism, designed to track and record information, namely, temperature probes, blood pressure measuring apparatus, bone density sensors; surgical instruments and micro surgery tools, namely, surgical cutters, scissors, staplers, forceps and scalpels; surgical pliers with built in measuring sensor to provide feedback to the surgeon and measures the gripping force being applied;cardiac urethral probe syringes, sutures, cauterizes, biopsy needles, ophthalmic surgery tools for use in cataract, initial lamellar resection of the cornea and vitrectomy procedures; medical instruments used in heart surgery, namely, cardiac retractors and cardiac stabilizer mounts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |