USPTO serial 76236181
FOXNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOXNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel D. Fetterley
DANIEL D FETTERLEY ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL, LLPSTE 1100100 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric sockets; electric plugs; electrical adapters; fiber optic cable; flexible printed circuit substrate; battery chargers; light emitting diodes; communication components for use with mobile phones, namely, wireless earphones and microphones; electrical and electronic components for communicating over fiber optic cable, namely, photo detectors, optical transmitters, optical receivers, optical amplifier modules, pump lasers, optical connectors, optical isolators, optical couplers, optical attenuators, optical switches, optical modulators, optical circulators, optical polarizes, optical filters, wave guides, wavelength division multiplexers, and optical add/drop multiplexers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |