USPTO serial 76236203
AIRBOSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2007
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AIRBOSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3P5, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3P5, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3P5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Jaffe
Michael A. Jaffe RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP1621 Euclid Ave.Floor 19Cleveland, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | protective safety boots for commercial, industrial and construction use; protective boots for nuclear, biological and chemical exposure; protective extreme cold weather boots for industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Mixed rubber compounds for use in the manufacture of tires; molded industrial rubber products, namely, rubber bumper for loading docks; fastening products for railway track made of rubber or plastic, namely, rail dampening pads and bearing pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | footwear, namely, work boots, rubber boots and military boots | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AirBoss of America Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by AirBoss of America Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by AirBoss of America Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named AIRBOSS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |