USPTO serial 76236243
POWERBRUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 2003
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POWERBRUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New Brunswick, NJ
New Brunswick, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D. ST. LANDAU
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH, LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1208Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | TOOTHBRUSHES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 16, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |