USPTO serial 76236291
AN EPICUREAN ADVENTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AN EPICUREAN ADVENTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY L. SHAPIRO, ESQ.
MARY L SHAPIRO ESQ TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 8SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | mail order catalog services featuring gift baskets containing quality grocery, bakery, delicatessen, beverages, and floral goods from around the world, namely, wines, coffees, teas, chocolate, cheeses, nuts, fresh and package fruits, fruit and vegetable preserves, breads, cookies, cakes, seasonings, condiments, floral arrangements, cook | ACTIVE | Jun 24, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |