Drawing for TEAMO SUPREMO

USPTO serial 76236372

TEAMO SUPREMO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEPHENS, SONYA B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEAMO SUPREMO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara J. Quinn

BARBARA J QUINN WALT DISNEYTHE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0643

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Address books; photograph albums; appliques in the form of decals; appointment books; arts and craft paint kits; autograph books; baby books; paper party bags; ball-point pens; binders; bookends; bookmarks; books featuring stories, games and activities for children; paper gift wrap bows; paper cake decorations; calendars; playing cards; gift cards; greeting cards; cartoons; pen and pencil cases; decorative paper centerpieces; chalk; children's activity books; modeling clay; paper table cloths; coloring books; comic strips; comic books; paper party decorations; diaries; gift wrapping paper; magazines and newspapers featuring stories, games and activities for children; paper party hats; paper napkins; pens; pencils; stationery; stickers; posters; notebooks; memo pads; erasers; pencil sharpeners; staplers; writing paper; envelopes; paper weights; paper coasters; paper mats; non-calibrated rulers; photographs; postcards; trading cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 9, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 12, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 5, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 27, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance