USPTO serial 76236373
LLOYD IN SPACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LLOYD IN SPACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara J. Quinn
BARBARA J QUINN WALT DISNEYTHE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0643Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded audio cassettes, and compact discs, all featuring music, stories and activities for children; pre-recorded video cassettes, laser video discs, digital video discs and digital versatile discs, all featuring animated stories and entertainment for children; computer game programs, video game cartridges and discs, and computer game cartridges and discs; CD-ROM discs and computer software all featuring music, stories, activities, educational material and entertainment for children; motion picture films, featuring animated stories for children; sunglasses; decorative refrigerator magnets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |