USPTO serial 76236374
TEAMO SUPREMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEAMO SUPREMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara J. Quinn
BARBARA J QUINN WALT DISNEYTHE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0643Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded audio cassettes, phonograph records and compact discs, all featuring music, stories and entertainment; pre-recorded video cassettes, laser video discs, digital video discs, digital versatile discs, and CD-ROM discs, all featuring games, stories and entertainment; computer game programs, video game cartridges and discs, and computer game cartridges and discs, all featuring games, stories and activities; computer software featuring games, educational material and entertainment; motion picture films featuring animated and live-action feature-length motion pictures; sunglasses; decorative refrigerator magnets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |