USPTO serial 76236488
OMNIPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OMNIPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Gaffin
RICHARD A GAFFIN MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND STONE1200 CAMPAU SQ PLZ99 MONROE AVE N WGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | REAGENTS FOR SCIENTIFIC OR RESEARCH USE IN CONNECTION WITH GENETIC MATERIALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | GENOMIC AND GENETIC PRODUCTS, NAMELY DNA SEQUENCES, REGENTS, ASSAYS, AND PROTEINS FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | SCIENTIFIC EQUIPMENT AND APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTATION NAMELY ROBOTIC PROBES, APPARATUS FOR SCREENING SAMPLES, DETECTING THE PRESENCE OF MATERIALS AND SAMPLES, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR MEASURING AND ANALYZING GENETIC INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rubicon Genomics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rubicon Genomics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named OMNIPLEX
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |