USPTO serial 76236628
EAT'NWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EAT'NWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nisshin Seifun Kabushiki Kaisha
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8441, JP
Nisshin Seifun Kabushiki Kaisha
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8441, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN C/O ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pasta, pasta sauces, flour-based batter mix comprised of a dry blend of flour, starch, skim milk powder and egg powder, bread crumbs, bread-based breading mix comprised of flour-based bread crumb or cracker meal, flour, wheat flour, tempura batter mix for making tempura, cake mixes, noodles, and boiled and dried noodles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |