USPTO serial 76236795
SILK ESSENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SILK ESSENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Belinda A. Boyer
CATHY J FUTROWSKY POLSINELLI SHALTON WELTE SUELTHAUS PC7733 FORSYTH BLVD 12TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WOMEN'S NIGHT SHIRTS, LOUNGE WEAR, SLEEP WEAR AND ROBES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |