Drawing for ICEEGG

USPTO serial 76236894

ICEEGG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICEEGG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yoon S. Ham; Kwang Yup Chae; Susan T. Brown; Richard M.Assmus

YOON S HAM KWANG YUP CHAE SUSAN T BR MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP1909 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018LUGGAGE, PURSES, SPORT BAGS AND BACKPACKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 17, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 25, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance