USPTO serial 76237080
SANUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SANUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Upton Douglass
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions, cafeteria services, catering services, cafes and restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |