USPTO serial 76237475
RPC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RPC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hawthorne, NY
Hawthorne, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RALPH J. CRISPINO
RALPH J CRISPINO REVEO INC85 EXECUTIVE BLVDELMSFORD, NY 10523-1326UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fuel cell components, namely anodes, cathodes, and membranes, fuel cell batteries, fuel cell subsystems, namely anodes, cathodes and membranes, fuel cell battery systems, namely anodes, cathodes, and membranes, fuel cell battery systems, namely anodes, cathodes, and membranes, fuel cell battery hybrid systems, namely anodes, cathodes and membranes and products utilizing fuel cell components, fuel cell batteries, fuel cell subsystems, fuel cell battery systems, fuel battery hybrid systems, namely metal air batteries and fuel cells, all using metal air technology | ACTIVE | Oct 12, 1999 |
| 040 | Manufacture of Fuel Cell Components, Fuel cell Batteries, Fuel Cell Subsystems, Fuel Cell Battery Systems, Fuel Cell Battery Hybrid Systems and products utilizing Fuel Cell Components, Fuel Cell Batteries, Fuel Cell Subsystems, Fuel Cell Battery Systems, Fuel Cell Battery Hybrid Systems namely metal air batteries and fuel cells, all using metal air technology to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | Oct 12, 1999 |
| 042 | Design and development for others of Fuel Cell Components, Fuel Cell Batteries, Fuel cell Subsystems, Fuel cell Battery Systems, Fuel Cell Hybrid Systems and products utilizing Fuel Cell Components, Fuel Cell Batteries, Fuel Cell Subsystems, Fuel Cell Battery Systems, Fuel Cell Battery Hybrid Systems namely metal air batteries and fuel cells, all metal air technology | ACTIVE | Oct 12, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by eVionyx, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by eVionyx, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RPC
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |