USPTO serial 76237498
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Kriegsman
EDWARD M KRIEGSMAN KRIEGSMAN & KRIEGSMAN665 FRANKLIN STFRAMINGHAM, MA 01702UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Vocal recognition software; computer voice recognition software for use over the global computer information; compact discs featuring voice recognition software; interactive compact discs featuring voice recognition software; magnetic discs featuring voice recognition software; optical discs featuring voice recognition software | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services; electronic mail services; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminal; information services provided via the global computer information network in the field of telecommunication connections, telematic and electronic broadcasting of data, computer aided transmission of messages, images, sounds and data; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others; providing a computer database in the field of voice recognition; computer software design for others; updating of computer software; rental of computer software; computer consultation in the field of computer hardware; computer engineering; recovery of computer data; computer services, namely, creating websites for others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |