USPTO serial 76237580
SHAREDTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHAREDTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. G. Horowitz
Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND IMAGES VIA THE INTERNET OR CABLE BROADCASTING NETWORKS; AND TELEVISION SET TOP BOXES USED FOR CONNECTING TO THE INTERNET AND CABLE BROADCASTING NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | TELEVISION ADVERTISING AGENCIES; RENTAL OF ADVERTISING SPACE; PROVIDING INFORMATION RELATING TO COMMODITY SALES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES BETWEEN DESKTOP COMPUTERS AND TELEVISION SETS VIA CABLE BROADCASTING; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND IMAGES BETWEEN TELEVISION SET TOP BOXES AND TELEVISION SETS VIA CABLE BROADCASTING; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; TELEVISION BROADCASTING; RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF IMAGES AND DATA; PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT CABLE TELEVISION SUBSCRIBERS; DESIGN OF ONLINE COMPUTER NETWORKS; RENTAL OF COMPUTER HARDWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sony Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SHAREDTV
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |