USPTO serial 76237596
PREVORA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PREVORA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benita J. Rohm, Esquire
BENITA J ROHM ESQ ROHM & MONSANTO PLC660 WOODWARD AVE STE 1525DETROIT, MI 48226-3518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Topical dental solutions for preventing tooth decay and gingivitis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |