USPTO serial 76237653
WINZTAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAJU, RADHIKA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WINZTAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Burwood Vic 3125, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colleen M. Keegan
COLLEEN M KEEGAN PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 17NEW YORK, NY 10036-2720UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMMERCIAL OR BUSINESS INFORMATION AGENCY SERVICES; COMPILATION AND REGISTRATION OF DATA CONCERNING GOODS OR SERVICES OFFERED FOR SALE BY OTHERS; COMMUNICATING INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC BY ALL MEANS OF DIFFUSION CONCERNING ALL KINDS OF GOODS OR SERVICES; OPERATION OF GOODS OR SERVICES IDENTIFICATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS BY WHICH ACCESS TO ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION ON GOODS OR SERVICES IS PROVIDED ON ELECTRONIC PRESENTATION OF IDENTIFICATION SIGN ASCRIBED TO THOSE GOODS OR SERVICES AND ALLOCATION OF IDENTIFICATION SIGNS FOR SUCH A SYSTEM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |