USPTO serial 76237820
TEAMWARE PL@ZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEAMWARE PL@ZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
00390 Helsinki, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Lee, Jr.
WILLIAM M LEE JR LEE, MANN, SMITH, MCWILLIAMS ET ALPO BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND SOFTWARE MANUALS SOLD THEREWITH, NAMELY COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN ACCESSING COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS SUCH AS THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK AND INTERNAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, COMMUNICATING INFORMATION BETWEEN FACILITIES ON THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR AN INTERNAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK, CREATING AND UPDATING HOME PAGES AND WEB PAGES ON THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR AN INTERNAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK, ELECTRONIC MAIL AND MESSAGE HANDLING, ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL, WORD-PROCESSING; CREATING AND UPDATING ELECTRONIC CALENDARS, DIARIES, NOTICE BOARD AND BUSINESS CARDS, CREATING AND DEVELOPING USER-DEFINED SOFTWARE DATABASES, DATABASE MANAGEMENT, INTEGRATING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE IN A LOCAL AREA NETWORK AND COMMUNICATING INFORMATION WITHIN AND BETWEEN COMPUTERS IN A LOCAL AREA NETWORK; COMPUTER SOFTWARE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION AND USER MANUALS SOLD TOGETHER AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, COMPUTER NETWORK MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR OTHERS; COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION AND ADVISORY SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING BUSINESS INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, COMPUTER NETWORK MANAGEMENT, PROCUREMENT OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE, AND COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF WEB SITE FOR OTHERS; HOSTING THE WED SITE OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP), NAMELY, HOSTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS OF OTHERS; DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; MAINTENANCE AND UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; LEASING TIME TO AN INTERACTIVE COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF MESSAGE HANDLING; REDIRECTING ELECTRONIC MAIL TO CHANGED PERSONAL ELECTRONIC ADDRESS; PUBLIC DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL; COMPUTER CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TEAMWARE GROUP OY
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TEAMWARE PL@ZA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |