USPTO serial 76237906
HEALTH ADVOCATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2745348Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2003
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALTH ADVOCATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA
GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Bikus
Christopher M. Bikus Husch Blackwell LLP13330 California Street, Suite 200Omaha, NE 68154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | ADVICE AND REVIEW OF HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS; SUBMISSION AND REVIEW OF HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS; ANALYSIS OF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE; ADVOCACY AND RESOLUTION OF HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Mar 17, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |