USPTO serial 76237915
PREZIOSO ESPERIENZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2807722Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2004
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PREZIOSO ESPERIENZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Willemstad, Curacao, AN
Willemstad, Curacao, AN
Willemstad, Curacao, AN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Bertagnolli
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 3500130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish; poultry; game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; fruit sauces; eggs; milk; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; and edible oils and fats; and condiments, namely, salad oils | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee; tea; cocoa; sugar; rice; tapioca; sago; grain and chicory based coffee substitute; flour, processed grains; bread; pastry; candy; ice cream; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt; mustard; herbal sauces; condiments, namely, vinegars, balsamic vinegars, vinegars infused with aromatic herbs, vinegars combined with fruit; and ice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Restaurants; veterinary services; agricultural advice; and scientific and industrial research in the field of balsamic vinegars, vinegars, vinegars infused with aromatic herbs, oil and salad oil | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Taloco Investments N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Taloco Investments N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Taloco Investments N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PREZIOSO ESPERIENZA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |