USPTO serial 76237955
REVOLUTIONARY POWER CELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REVOLUTIONARY POWER CELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hawthorne, NY
Hawthorne, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerow D. Brill
GEROW D BRILL REVEO, INC85 EXECUTIVE BLVDELMSFORD, NY 10523UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Components for metal-air fuel cell batteries, namely anodes, cathodes, and membranes, metal-air fuel cell batteries, metal-air fuel cell subsystems, namely anodes, cathodes and membranes, metal-air fuel cell battery systems, namely anodes, cathodes, and membranes | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacture of metal-air fuel cell components, metal-air fuel cell batteries, metal-air fuel cell subsystems, metal-air fuel cell battery systems, metal-air fuel cell battery hybrid systems and products utilizing metal-air fuel cell components, metal-air fuel cell batteries, metal-air fuel cell subsystems, metal-air fuel cell battery systems, metal-air fuel cell battery hybrid systems to the order and specifications of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development for others of metal-air fuel cell components, metal-air fuel cell batteries, metal-air fuel cell subsystems, metal-air fuel cell battery systems, metal-air fuel cell battery hybrid systems and products utilizing metal-air fuel cell components, metal-air fuel cell batteries, metal-air fuel cell subsystems, metal-air fuel cell battery systems, metal-air fuel cell battery hybrid systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |