USPTO serial 76237965
MOUSE PARTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOUSE PARTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William B. Kircher
AUDREY P DAMONTE ESQ IGT9295 PROTOTYPE DRRENO, NV 89521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | GAME MACHINES WITH OR WITHOUT VIDEO OUTPUT AND VIDEO GAMES SOLD AS A COMPONENT PART THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Anchor Gaming
- Other trademarks owned by Anchor Gaming
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MOUSE PARTY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |