Drawing for TETHERNET

USPTO serial 76238063

TETHERNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TETHERNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa A. Weiland

MELISSA A WEILAND MUNDT MACGREGOR LLP999 3RD AVE STE 4200SEATTLE, WA 98104-4090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for managing home computer networks, namely, software for controlling the allocation of Internet Protocol addresses, of network security resources, of file storage and retrieval resources and of related networking resources, all within the home computer network; Computer software for use in the home, namely, software to provide access to the Internet, e-mail applications and on-line files via the home network and via 802.11 wireless, 10/100 base T Ethernet, telephone lines, power lines, DSL lines, cable modem, and satellite technologiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 26, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 28, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 27, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 26, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 28, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance