Drawing for YONGWOODONG

USPTO serial 76238075

YONGWOODONG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHEFFIELD, SHARI
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YONGWOODONG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

YOON S. HAM

YOON S HAM JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2237UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045RESTAURANTS; CHINESE RESTAURANTS; KOREAN RESTAURANTS; BUFFET RESTAURANTS; PERSONAL CHEF SERVICES; PERSONAL SHOPPING SERVICES FOR OTHERS; INTERIOR DESIGN; AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 31, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 8, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 22, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 27, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance