Drawing for MEC SPORTS

USPTO serial 76238115

MEC SPORTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEC SPORTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey T. Imai

JEFFREY T IMAI MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC337 MAGNA DRAURORA, ON L4G 7K1CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009gaming machines, namely video lottery terminalsACTIVE—
036wagering services featuring off-track betting, intertrack wagering and sports wagering via television, telephone and a global computer networkACTIVE—
041entertainment services, namely, organizing and conducting thoroughbred horse races, conducting horse race exhibitions; amusement park services; organizing and conducting stage shows, night club shows, contests, dances and parties; television production services; entertainment centers providing facilities for recreational activities and game arcade services; party planning services and event planning services featuring play areas, magic shows and other live entertainment; providing information in the fields of entertainment and education via a global computer network; production of exhibitions and exhibits in the nature of boxing or wrestling matches, magic shows, concerts; production of films and television shows in the field of sportsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 15, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 20, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance