USPTO serial 76238265
ETRUSTCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ETRUSTCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KRISTEN M. WALSH
KRISTEN M WALSH NIXON PEABODY LLPCLINTON SQPOST OFFICE BOX 31051ROCHESTER, NY 14603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking services, namely, checking account services, direct deposit services, electronic banking, automated teller machine services, savings, certificate of deposit and money market interest account services, residential and commercial mortgage loan services, home equity credit line and loan services and commercial loan services, auto and recreational loan services; personal and student loan services; credit card services; professional and individual retirement account services; personal and corporate trust services; estate and financial planning services; executor and trust management services; investment management services and public and municipal funds depository services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |