USPTO serial 76238313
FLAVORLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLAVORLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1214 Vernier, CH
1214 Vernier, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Josephic
DAVID J JOSEPHIC WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP2700 CAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing information in the field of flavoring products, ingredients, and compositions thereof and applications for such products to customers in the food, beverage and flavor industries via an interactive searchable database on a local and global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |