Drawing for GREAT FLOORS

USPTO serial 76238600

GREAT FLOORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREAT FLOORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith D. Grzelak

KEITH D GRZELAKWELLS ST JOHN ROBERTS GREGORY & MATKINS601 W 1ST AVE STE 1300SPOKANE, WA 99201-3828

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019FLOOR COVERINGS OF CERAMIC TILEACTIVE
027FLOOR COVERINGS OF VINYL, LINOLEUM, WOOD, STONE, MARBLE, GRANITE, PLASTIC, AND ARTIFICIAL STONE; CARPETS; RUGS; FLOOR MATS AND FLOOR MATTING OF VINYL, TEXTILE AND RUBBERACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 12, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 18, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Dec 23, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Oct 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 23, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 23, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 22, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Feb 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance