USPTO serial 76238741
SLICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SLICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY P. GOONAN, ESQ.
GREGORY P GOONAN ESQ MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT, LLP225 BROADWAY STE 1900SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Wireless telecommunications services, including the provision of cellular telephone service and wireless network access, and electronic transmission of information and data via the Internet, mobile phones, and wireless devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | On-line services including the provision of web pages and the provision of e-mail notices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |