USPTO serial 76238817
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Consystant Design Technologies, Inc.
Kirkland, WA
Other trademarks owned by Consystant Design Technologies, Inc.
Consystant Design Technologies, Inc.
Kirkland, WA
Other trademarks owned by Consystant Design Technologies, Inc.
Consystant Design Technologies, Inc.
Kirkland, WA
Other trademarks owned by Consystant Design Technologies, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Barber
CONSYSTANT DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES INC4055 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NE STE 200KIRKLAND, WA 98033UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, a software tool that allows software developers to store and distribute the reusable objects of a computer system | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |